Here at Control Wee there is the philosophy, ‘if someone else wants to do the work for you, then why not let them’. Although we enjoy writing, we are more than happy to publish the rants of others. Delegation, management gurus will tell you, is a key leadership tool. And so we are going to use it whenever possible.
Mark Jones, a friend of CW, has kindly written a post for us. It speaks for itself, so needs no further introduction. Thanks Mark.
I was reading a newspaper article the other night that, once again, was widely condemning the British Broadcasting Corporation.
In another corner of the room, my housemate was leaning forward, his hands were tightly gripping a controller for the Xbox 360, and a look of intense concentration was etched across his face.
For anyone who does not know what an Xbox is: it is Bill Gates latest attempt to dominate the living room space with a next generation games machine.
For entertainment purposes, we also have a Sky television box, a computer and a DVD player with a wide selection of titles. My housemate, whom I shall call Mr X, has spent most of his free time sat at the Xbox, nigh on worshipping its addictive capabilities. Very capable it is too: you can now play poker, chess or any other game with anyone in the world. The small white box, which bears a passing resemblance to the obelisk in 2001, is considered to be the future of entertainment.
The Skybox, DVD player, and most prominently the five main terrestrial television channels are becoming less attractive (and less used) by the minute. Is the Xbox really that great. Or are Sky television et al severely lacking?
Now, back to that newspaper article. It details in length the excessive salaries paid to the BBC staff, taxi cab fairs which would seem excessive even to Caligula, and a general feeling that the BBC treats the licence fee payers with contempt. The words ‘Gravy’ and ‘Train’ are used several times in the article. There is also mention of the competition scandal involving the programme ‘Blue Peter’. Apparently a competition was organised which involved children voting for a name which would be appointed to a Blue Peter cat. The makers of Blue Peter (all fully grown adults) decided against the name chosen by the children, and chose a name they had concocted themselves.
From this you might assume that they had to change the name as the winning moniker was racist or somehow not politically correct. Well, actually, they just felt their name was better. So, yes, fully-grown adults defrauded children. Sad isn’t it?

The newspaper article concludes by stating that morale at the BBC is at an all time low, and that there may be strikes due to staff cutbacks. The cutbacks are needed as apparently the BBC overestimated the amount of money it would receive from the Government (something about spending money before it is in the bank anyone?). There is no mention in the article of how the BBC’s problems can be fixed. You must remember that a lot of journalists highlight problems; they do not suggest how they may be solved.
It might seem that I have a serious gripe with the BBC and that nothing would give me more pleasure than to see them out of business. But this isn’t true.
I admire and love the BBC. I grew up with it and regard it as a friend who taught me about the world, entertained me, and crusaded for peoples’ rights, whether they were in the UK or another continent.
However, something has gone wrong at the BBC of late. It has become a flabby, uncouth old man who is out of touch with modern Britain. It resembles a bullied and confused employee, when it should be the assertive and on-the-ball employer.
Rather than just mouthing off I’ll list my own recent gripes with the BBC now. I’ll even suggest some solutions – I am a licence fee payer after all.
BBC Radio 4
First things first, kick out all those smug useless Oxbridge graduates who have been nowhere and done nothing. Many of them are at the BBC only because of their University connections. Their whimsical reports about how they went to Italy when they were sixteen to get an ice cream are irrelevant, lazy and unimaginative. Get them out and about and tell us what is going on in the world today. Allow them to keep their raspberry-coated boring tales of youth to themselves. Where is the new Alistair Cook? Where is the new John Simpson?
BBC News
I want to see news reporters who look like they have seen some action, not pretty boys with perfect hair or celebrity dolly birds who would look more at home in an issue of ‘Hello’ magazine. Can the BBC not revolve their foreign correspondents and have them cover the news desk once in a while?
While you’re at it, some good news would be a plus. Have you asked people why they have stopped watching news bulletins? Could it be they find the programme content depressing? By good news I don’t mean Paris Hilton’s latest fashion folly or a plug for someone’s book or album. I mean stories about people who are out there doing good for their community, or trying to inspire those around them – go out and find them!
BBC Three and Four, BBC News 24
Scrap them now. They are out of touch, lazy and both about as cutting edge as a spoon. “These are great original services which represent the future of digital broadcasting” the BBC insists on telling us. Since when was putting ‘Rambo: First Blood part two’ on every night of the week original?
Newsnight and Top Gear
Don’t you dare make any changes to these two programmes. You are lucky to have them and they are the only two shows the public like. If anything you should scrap a lot of your new services to increase the budgets of these two programmes.
Digital radio shows
Scrap these. They are a waste of the licence fee and the money would be better spent elsewhere.
BBC web pages
Your BBC news page is the best on the internet and should be expanded. Please don’t waste any money on ‘niche’ web sites that are pompous and irrelevant.
Documentary cut backs
Don’t do it! Shut down your digital television and radio channels – it is time to put your house in order.
Star Power and Star Salaries
Here is the answer to your most publicised problem: YOU the BBC are the employer!
You should not be dictated to by stars or their agents: these people should be bloody grateful you gave them a job. Working for the BBC is an honour and a major boost for anyone’s career. Stars do not guarantee an audience; a quality programme will get a good audience every time. Remember your adaptation of ‘Pride and Prejudice’ back in 1996? For me it was your finest hour. Was it full of bloated, overpaid stars? No it wasn’t. Good material should come first before you start to bend over for star’s salaries. Start with established and popular material such as classic books or reinventions of popular programmes.
On the subject of bloated, we (your audience) are sick and tired of those dinosaurs you keep overpaying. Their eyes are glazed from all the free booze and their waistlines are straining from all the business lunches. Many of them are unkempt, unshaven and nearly as big as the couches they are sat on. Make them walk to work before you pay hundreds of pounds to have them carted up and down the country in a taxi.
There is an argument to say there isn’t any new talent our there. I totally disagree with this. I’m no daytime TV fan, but I think you’ve found a good presenter in Dominic Littlewood. This is a guy who was a used car salesman and has had no formal television training, but he has more charisma in his big toe than many of your RADA trained planks.
There are natural characters working on markets, driving taxis, and fixing boilers. Why don’t you have an X Factor show based on finding new presenters? You want lean and hungry people who will be grateful for the opportunity and won’t demand earth-shattering salaries.
It seems the BBC worries that they would lose their audience if the ‘stars’ left them. How many ‘stars’ leave television shows and end up coming right back? This happens because the programme was bigger than they were. Dragon’s Den has succeeded because of its formula, not its ‘stars’.
So what should the BBC do? Why not install someone radical or generally different? Wouldn’t it be great to see a boardroom full of people who are difficult, blunt, can criticise and most importantly: know what they’re talking about. It would be great to see John Simpson, Jeremy Clarkson, Jeremy Paxman, and anyone else who is either eccentric or has openly criticised the BBC, calling the shots. At the moment they have too many cooks in management, their indifference and the meals they are serving taste rotten.



Also, the BBC should start accepting criticism. BBC employees who criticise their employer should not be told to keep it to themselves. They should be listened to. Why not even have an internal debate about the future?
Conclusion
The BBC are in a period of illness, but there is a cure and the sooner they take their medicine the better. I wish them all the best and hope I see them in good health soon. I hope the BBC starts to listen to what their public says, and most importantly remembers that they are the boss.
Mark Jones
Media, Thoughts | 4 Comments »